Back to Homepage / Blogs / Jul 2019
World Heritage Site Status for Pagan
It was extraordinary that Pagan did not have World Heritage Site status, all the other great historical sites in South-East Asia, like Angkor or Borobadur, have long been listed. The first official Burmese application was in 1995 but there had been
discussions long before that and Unesco had been actively involved in restoration work through the 1980s, following the devastation of the 1975 earthquake. Back then I was privileged to assist the French archaeologist Pierre Pichard in his great survey
of the monuments. It seemed inevitable that the site would be listed and then 1988 happened and Burma went back into the dark ages.
The only news from Pagan during those dark days of Slorc* dictatorship was in 1990: the community who had long lived in a village of outstanding charm and loveliness were relocated at gun point one morning without any advance notice. They were moved
to a peripheral location in the desert like plain with neither water nor electricity and had to make temporary shacks using materials dismantled from their former homes. I had lived in the village for over a year in 1986 and was appalled and wrote an
article for a magazine about it resulting in being banned from Burma by the regime for several years.
By the mid-90s Burma seemed to be changing and the door opened ajar for foreign investors and tourism. I was forgiven past demeanours and allowed back in to pursue publishing projects, including Pierre's stupendous eight volume Inventory of Monuments
at Pagan that I co-published with Unesco. However, something terrible was happening at Pagan. The local population now relocated out of the way, Slorc embarked on an ambitious restoration programme. The Archaeology Department's
highly trained experts were side lined; the military stepped in and conducted all operations themselves. Pagan had not seen so much building activity since its heyday in the 13th century.
Local cement factories and brick works saw their output scale up to levels previously unimaginable. Nearly every single one of the 4000 monuments were completely rebuilt using modern British type bricks and Portland cement. At Old Pagan the bricks
were essentially square tiles of only about 4 inches thick and they had no cement, using only the minutest amount of lime mortar as the bricks were so flat that they interlocked perfectly. The military architects used considerable licence, constructing
elaborate superstructures where the originals had been lost, more figments of a romantic imagination than bearing any connection to original forms used between the 11th and 13th centuries.
New roads were constructed, including a dual carriageway
dissecting the site into two; trees were planted everywhere – greening it up, yes, but loosing once great vistas. Even a golf course was constructed within the Zone. Many said it was a racket whereby the army were extorting donations for the restoration nationwide and then making lots of money out of the brickworks, cements factory and construction contracts all
of which they controlled.
Unesco were appalled. Pierre vowed never to step foot in Pagan. I was in tears when I saw what they had done. Later, after starting Pandaw in 1995, when I took the bus from the airfield to the river bank I would shut my eyes. Not surprisingly when
Slorc applied to Unesco in 1995 their application fell on deaf ears.
In recent times, now that Slorc have stepped down and there is a semblance of democracy, the issue in discussions with Unesco was more about tourism development. Speculators had long been buying up chunks of land around Pagan, particularly along the
river bank, and a number of new luxury hotels joined the old ones, since refurbished. These speculators had strong and powerful influence so the discussion with Unesco now was over 'planning' rather than restoration. I am glad to say that the Archaeology
Department managed to block several humungous projects which eased the path of the application. Rather like at Siem Reap in Cambodia, visitors to Angkor would in the future
accommodated in a hotel zone far from the monuments – now materialising as ribbon developments along the roads in and out beyond the limits of the archaeological zone.
I wonder just how much difference to tourism being a World Heritage Site will make? Is this really going to clinch a decision on where to go on holiday? The vacuum formed by the collapse of western tourism to Burma since the Rohyingya crisis of last
year was filled almost overnight with regional tourists – Thais are the largest number of foreign visitors, but the largest number overall are Myanmar tourists visiting their own great cultural sites. When they open the planned international airport a
short drive away at Pakokku, Pagan will be open to direct flights from China. (Siem Reap gets a dozen flights a day
from China.) Mercifully, this is still a few years off as they have been discussing this project for aslong as they have been negotiating with Unesco. It may be that for the much-
anticipated Chinese hoards World Heritage status would be the clincher.
What will be the benefits of World Heritage Status? It is unlikely that Unesco are going to come in and re-restore the temples and the issue of their incorrect reconstruction seems to have been gently forgotten. Hopefully there will be money and
training for the archaeology department – the mural paintings in many temples are in a woeful condition and mass tourism is not helping. The best thing is probably the fact that the Burmese government really want this as they think lots more tourists
will come and in order to keep the listing they will have to stop any property developers from building new hotels within the Zone. It is even said that the ones already in the Zone will have to be closed and dismantled by 2025.
I hope also that Unesco will do something to protect the monuments from mass tourism. The great stupas and temples were never intended to be climbed, they are giant symbols with shrines around their peripheries, but every tourist wants to climb to the
top, particularly at the sunset hour causing erosion. Burmese Buddhists have been appalled by inappropriately dressed youngsters in skimpy clothing and Unesco might embark on a programme to inform tourists on appropriate dress and behaviour within these
sacred sites. I have mentioned the mural paintings that are unprotected from sweaty paws and the larger temples are now overrun with touts and vendors. Then there is the appalling plastic pollution – litter from the masses of local tourists who all the
time are eating and drinking and chucking their litter on the ground because there are no bins or if there are bins they are never emptied. Let's hope Unesco can sort these things out.
Despite all the terrible things that Slorc did to Pagan through the 90s most visitors remain awestruck and the old magic is still there. Overcoming prejudices, I often head off in the early morning on my mountain bike and really enjoy exploring the
less visited areas and the area is vast! When I meet our Pandaw travellers on the boats there is a strong level of excitement and interest in what they have experienced at Pagan. I would be a huge bore if I was to say: "you never knew Pagan as it
was"!
Pandaw founder Paul Strachan is author of Pagan: Art and Architecture of Old Burma. Kiscadale 1989.
*State Law and Order Restoration Council
